In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has provided clarity on the disciplinary actions taken by the Securities Appellate Tribunal regarding financial irregularities. The case involved the appellant appealing against a penalty imposed for misconduct in business conduct. The Tribunal’s decision has far-reaching implications for maintaining market integrity and fair trade practices. Stay informed about this crucial legal judgment.
Facts
- The Securities Appellate Tribunal rejected the appeal against the order passed by the Disciplinary Action Committee of National Stock Exchange of India Ltd.
- The appellant was found guilty of financial irregularities and misconduct in the conduct of business.
- A fine/penalty of Rs.10 lakhs was imposed on the appellant along with a suspension from trading membership for five trading days.
- The appellant argues that the penalty/fine could only be imposed in the context of Circular dated 27.06.2013.
- The circular specifies penalties for improper use of funds raised by placing clients’ securities with banks or financial institutions.
- The circular states a penalty of Rs. 1,00,000 or 0.1% of the value of misuse, whichever is higher, for misutilization of clients’ funds and/or securities.
- According to the appellant, the appropriate authority could not have issued suspension of trading membership based on the circular.
Also Read: Court’s Jurisdiction in Re-appraising Arbitrator’s Findings
Arguments
- Ample power bestowed on appropriate authority to suspend trading membership of a member for misconduct
- No fault found with the order passed by the appropriate authority
Also Read: Contrary Directions in Issuance of Letter of Intent
Analysis
- The authority could not have imposed penalty/fine exceeding the limit specified in the circular
- The circular provided a quantified limit for the penalty that could be imposed
- The authority’s actions were subject to the constraints set by the circular
- Chapter IV Rule 1 of the bye-laws allows the relevant authority to take disciplinary actions against a trading member
- Disciplinary actions include expulsion, suspension, fines, censure, warnings, and withdrawal of membership rights
- The relevant authority can require a trading member to suspend its business in part or in whole if it engages in prejudicial business practices
- Prejudicial business practices include activities that upset market equilibrium or cause demoralization in the market
- Contravention, non-compliance, disobedience, or evasion of Exchange Bye Laws, Rules, and Regulations can lead to disciplinary actions by the relevant authority
- Conduct deemed dishonourable, disgraceful, or inconsistent with fair trade principles can also result in disciplinary actions
- Appellant argued that trading membership can only be suspended if misconduct falls under the concerned Bye-law such as Bye-law 8(a).
- Penalty should not exceed Rs. 1 lakh or 0.1% of the value of misuse, whichever is higher.
- Appellate Tribunal did not address the arguments of the appellant on the suspension and quantum of penalty imposed.
- Appellant specifically raised the issue of the appropriateness of suspending trading membership and the quantum of penalty.
- Appellate Tribunal failed to examine the contention regarding the violation of NSE Circular dated June 27, 2013.
- Appellate Tribunal rejected the appeal based on the penalty imposed without considering the arguments raised by the appellant.
Also Read: Application for Stay in Civil Suit Rejected: Court’s Legal Analysis
Decision
- The final order allows the Tribunal to make appropriate decisions regarding the amount deposited by the appellant.
- No cost order was issued.
- Any pending applications have been disposed of.
- The impugned order is set aside, and the appellant is directed back to the Appellate Tribunal for reconsideration on the quantum of punishment.
- Appeal No 53 of 2017 is restored to the file of the Securities Appellate Tribunal in Mumbai for reconsideration on punishment.
- The Appellate Tribunal should prioritize and handle the reconsideration process promptly.
- The Appellate Tribunal is instructed not to delve into the technicalities of the appellant’s withdrawal of appeal No 60/2017.
- The decision in the Civil Appeal is in accordance with the signed order.
Case Title: M/S PRRSAAR THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR VED PRAKASH GUPTA Vs. NATIONAL STOCK EXCHANGE OF INDIA LTD
Case Number: C.A. No.-003260-003260 / 2017
