Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant has vehemently submitted that it was the specific case on behalf of the appellant before the High Court that as the original writ petitioners before the High Court were the subsequent purchasers, they have no locus to challenge the acquisition / lapsing of acquisition. Union of India & Ors., (2019) 10 SCC 229, the decision in the case of Manav Dharam Trust and Anr. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the contesting respondents – original writ petitioners is not in a position to dispute that they had purchased the land in question subsequent to the acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. On the aforesaid ground alone, the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court deserves to be quashed and set aside. The impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court is hereby quashed and set aside. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
Also Read: https://newslaw.in/case-type/civil/c-a-no-003481-003481-2022/
Case Title: GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Vs. VIJAY GUPTA (2023 INSC 297)
Case Number: C.A. No.-001784-001784 / 2023
