In a landmark decision by the Delhi High Court, the case involving the appointment of Education Officers under OBC and SC categories has seen a new development. The Court intervened in the matter raised by the petitioners and directed the Tribunal to ensure consistency in applying any weightage formula for the selection process. This judgment impacts the future of aspiring Education Officers, bringing clarity to the merit-based selection process.
Facts
- The petitioners in the case were directed to be considered for appointment to the post of Education Officer under the OBC and SC categories.
- A weightage of 85% was to be given to the marks obtained in the written examination and 15% weightage to the interview.
- The formula of 85% weightage to the written examination and 15% weightage to the interview was applied.
- The respondents consented to this formula on the condition that only two additional candidates would be accommodated through supernumerary posts.
- FAC did not dispute the factual accuracy of the judgment
- FAC prays for the dismissal of the writ petitions
Arguments
- Accommodating further candidates by supernumerary post is not possible at this stage
- Insufficient capacity to add additional candidates
- Declined the petitioner’s request for additional candidates
Analysis
- The Tribunal’s course of action was deemed impermissible.
- Considered view based on submissions and records.
- Learned counsel’s arguments were taken into account.
- Judicial review was necessary due to the Tribunal’s actions.
- The Court did not express any opinion on the 85% weightage for written examination and 15% weightage for the interview set by the learned Tribunal.
- The Tribunal’s decision to give different weightage should have been applied to all candidates, not just the two petitioners.
- Applying different procedures for the same test goes against the principles of the Indian Constitution.
Decision
- Two petitioners in W.P.(C) 6047/2020 allowed to continue as Education Officers until the Tribunal decides on the OA again.
- The Tribunal instructed to ensure consistency in applying any weightage formula for written examination and interview.
- The decision of the Tribunal for O.A. No 663/2014 set aside and to be revised based on merit.
Case Title: DR. NIKHIL KUMAR AND ORS Vs. UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION AND ORS (2024:DHC:4030-DB)
Case Number: W.P.(C)-7656/2020
