Delve into the recent judgment by Justice Tushar Rao Gedela on May 31, 2024, where the eligibility criteria for the post of Professor were scrutinized in the case of Gedela v. University. The judgment sheds light on crucial aspects of academic qualifications and professional reputation, impacting the selection of candidates for this esteemed position.
Analysis
- The Show Cause Notice mentions sub-Clause (iii) in relation to the petitioner’s lacking essential qualifications.
- The eligibility conditions specified by the UGC use the term ‘and/or’.
- Despite the petitioner’s eight years of service with the respondent, the issue pertains to their selection as a Professor.
- The words ‘and/or’ also apply to the post of Professor, as per the UGC guidelines.
- The rationale from Dr. Harvinder Popli case is relevant to the present situation.
- The Recruitment Rule for the post of Professor includes criteria regarding Ph.D. degree, research publications, teaching experience, and reputation in the relevant field.
- Candidates can qualify under either category A or category B based on their credentials and contributions.
- The criteria for eligibility as a Professor are detailed and involve both academic qualifications and professional reputation.
Decision
- The issues raised in the present writ petition are similar to those raised in previous judgments.
- The directions given in the previous judgments will also apply to the present petitioners.
- The petitioner will be granted protection to take steps for redressal of her grievances.
- The petition is disposed of by Justice Tushar Rao Gedela on May 31, 2024.
Case Title: DR. RICHA HIRENDRA RAI Vs. DELHI PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES AND RESEARCH UNIVERSITY (2024:DHC:4627)
Case Number: W.P.(C)-8579/2024
