In a recent legal case, the court is faced with a crucial decision on whether to transfer jurisdiction due to significant distance between the parties involved. The petitioner’s counsel argues for transfer to alleviate the burden on the petitioner, making a compelling case for consideration. Stay tuned for more insights on the court’s legal analysis in this jurisdiction transfer request.
Arguments
- Petitioner’s counsel argued that the case filed by the respondent is in Sirohi, Rajasthan, while the petitioner resides in Gandhinagar, Gujarat, which is a distance of 237 km.
- Petitioner finds it difficult to travel to Sirohi for defending the case.
- Transfer of the divorce case is requested due to the distance and inconvenience.
- Despite notice served to the respondent, there was no representation from their end.
Also Read: Court’s Legal Analysis on Specific Performance in Tribal Land Transfer Case
Case Title: MAMTA Vs. KAILASH CHAND AGRAWAL (2021 INSC 768)
Case Number: T.P.(C) No.-002460 / 2019
