Explore a comprehensive legal analysis of a recent court case focusing on compensation for land acquisition. The court’s in-depth examination of market value determinations sheds light on the complexities involved in determining fair compensation for acquired land. Gain a deeper understanding of the legal considerations at play in such cases.
Facts
- Compensation enhanced to Rs.8 lakhs per acre in Harbachan Kaur & Ors. v. State of Punjab in 2006
- Finality of the award as no appeal was filed against it
- Compensation of Rs.5,96,000/- per acre awarded by the Reference Court
- High Court’s judgment based on proximity of Village Kambali and Village Sohana
- Present appeals against orders passed by the High Court maintaining compensation at Rs.4 lakhs per acre
- Reference Court awarded Rs.6,96,000/- per acre based on determination in Village Lakhnaur
- Consideration of compensation for super-structures in the award
- Land owners argued for higher compensation based on awards in subsequent notifications
- Compensation of Rs.5,96,000/- per acre for Village Sohana in 1991 and Rs.6,96,000/- per acre in 1993
- Award of Rs.5,96,000/- per acre for Village Kambali in 1988
- Total land of 123 acres 6 kanals and 1 marla was acquired, with a portion in Village Sohana and a portion in Village Lakhnaur.
- Challenges to the award of the Reference Court are pending in High Court.
- Notifications for land acquisition were issued in 1990 and 1991 for the two villages.
- Union utilized a portion of the acquired land for Border Security Force.
- Argument made for using compensation in Village Kambali as a guide for determining compensation in Village Sohana was rejected due to substantial distance between the villages.
- High Court awarded compensation at Rs. 8 lakhs per acre for land acquired in 1993.
- Relying on previous compensation determinations, the Reference Court’s market value award was upheld by the High Court.
- Proximity analysis of various villages showed differences in locations influencing compensation assessments.
- Multiple acquisitions and compensation awards have been made for land in Village Sohana.
- Cross-objections were filed by the landowners regarding the acquisition notifications.
Also Read: Landmark Judgment on Compensation for Fatal Accident
Analysis
- Market value of Village Kambali cannot be considered for compensation determination.
- Deduction should be made from the market value determination in the notification dated 26.10.1990.
- The nearest village to Village Sohana is Mataur, not Kambali/Kambala.
- The High Court’s assessment of Rs.4 lakhs per acre for land value is justified.
- No appeal made against the market value determination.
- The increase in market value is due to development from earlier notifications, not just a percentage increase.
- Market value cannot be based on the notification dated 11.11.1993 due to intervening notifications in 1990 and 1991.
- Alternative assessment based on yearly increases post the notification in 1981 till 1990.
- No relevant sale instances for land in Village Sohana post the 1981 notification.
- Determination of market value post-notification cannot be used for earlier acquisitions.
- No relevant sale deeds to indicate land use potential for residential, commercial, or industrial purposes.
- The Reference Court awarded compensation of Rs.4 lakhs per acre for land in Village Lakhnaur.
- Relevance is given to previous judgments for determining compensation.
- Compensation assessment in later notifications does not apply to earlier acquisitions.
- Village Kambali/Kambala not adjoining Village Sohana as per the layout plan provided by appellants.
- High Court’s orders were found to be error-free
- No interference was warranted in the present appeals
Also Read: Judicial Review of Search and Seizure Authorization
Decision
- No merit found in the appeals based on the discussion provided.
Also Read: Land Acquisition Compensation Legal Analysis
Case Title: BHAG SINGH ETC. ETC. Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ETC. (2022 INSC 515)
Case Number: C.A. No.-004070-004075 / 2012