Landmark Decision: Delhi High Court Sets Timelines for Transplantation Authorization Committees

In a significant ruling by the Delhi High Court, specific timelines have been established for the Authorization Committees in transplantation cases. This landmark decision aims to enhance efficiency and expedite the decision-making process for organ donation. The judgment will have far-reaching implications for ensuring prompt action in cases involving organ transplantation.

Facts

  • Proper timelines are to be fixed for timely-disposal of applications received by patients for transplantation.
  • An organized and timely transplantation decision-making process is crucial as per THOTA and 2014 Rules.
  • Timelines must be prescribed for various steps to uphold the transplantation decision-making process.
  • Failure to prescribe timelines would nullify the intended process outlined in the 1994 Act and 2014 Rules.

Analysis

  • The Court emphasizes the importance of adhering to timelines in the organ donation process.
  • Timelines have been insufficient and led to extended waiting periods of 2 to 3 years in some cases.
  • Specific timelines have now been fixed for most steps taken by the Authorization Committee.
  • Steps such as processing applications and verifying documents should be completed within set timeframes.
  • The communication issued regarding timelines was found to dilute the timelines set in the 2014 Rules.

Decision

  • Implementation of timelines provided in a communication dated 3rd May, 2024 by all Authorization Committees
  • Adequate publicity to be given to stakeholders including hospitals and governmental authorities
  • Communication regarding deficiencies in documentation or procedural formalities to be sent via email or WhatsApp ensuring proof of communication
  • Maximum one week to respond to communication for donor or recipient
  • Cases to be presented to Authorization Committee upon expiry of response timeline

Case Title: AMAR SINGH BHATIA & ANR. Vs. SIR GANGA RAM HOSPITAL & ORS. (2024:DHC:4132)

Case Number: W.P.(C)-3590/2020

Click here to read/download original judgement

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *