Explore the insightful legal analysis by the court regarding the selection process for police constables, focusing on nuanced aspects like reservation policies, disqualification criteria, and the re-working of selection lists. This case summary delves into the intricate legal framework that governs recruitments in the public sector.
Facts
- Result declared on 16.07.2015, with 38315 candidates successful
- Respondents filled only 1650 out of 2016 seats for male general category candidates in Constable PAC Post
- Respondents filled only 446 out of 1038 seats for male general category candidates in Constable Fireman Post
- Selection process for 41610 posts of Police Constables initiated on 20.06.2013
- Vacancies remained unfilled as suitable candidates were not available on that date
- Petitioners participated in the selection process as General Category candidates
- Candidates who used blades or whiteners were considered in the selection process for Police Constables.
- Candidates selected as per the directions in Saket Kumar were not to be removed from the selection process.
- Those who used blades or whiteners were to be given an advantage in a notional selection.
- Additional candidates selected were to be reckoned against additional posts, not the original ones.
- Selection list was re-worked based on the principles established in Hanuman Dutt Shukla.
- 4429 candidates were identified to be given the advantage as per the law declared in Hanuman Dutt Shukla.
Also Read: Electoral Malpractices in Mayor Election
Analysis
- High Court disqualified candidates using blades or whiteners in answer papers, ordering deletion of their names from selection list
- Supreme Court decision in Hanuman Dutt Shukla case held disqualification of such candidates as improper
- Decisions in Ashish Kumar Pandey and Upendra cases addressed horizontal reservation issue, impacting vacant seats in selection process
- 2312 vacancies for police constables remained unfilled, with 982 vacancies due to various reasons like non-reporting of selected candidates
- Candidates from reserved categories were initially selected against reserved category seats but later moved to open category, affecting open category candidates.
- Petitioners argued that all reserved category seats should have been given to open category candidates.
- 3295 additional posts were made available for selection, and candidates previously selected in reserved categories were considered for open category posts.
- The re-working exercise of selection was deemed legal and valid by the court.
- Adjustment of candidates between reserved and open categories was part of the same selection process initiated in 2013.
Also Read: Balancing Power and Transparency: Electoral Bonds Struck Down, Disclosure Mandated
Decision
- The petition is dismissed
- No merit was found in the petition
- Decision was made based on lack of merit
Also Read: Recall of Resolution Plan Approval: Legal Analysis
Case Title: PRAMOD KUMAR SINGH Vs. THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH (2021 INSC 188)
Case Number: W.P.(C) No.-000465 / 2020