In a recent legal case, a Review Petition seeking action against respondents under Section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was dismissed due to the court’s determination that the grounds raised did not justify interference in the decision. The court found the administrative committee’s order to be based on a correct appreciation of facts and law, highlighting the importance of legal analysis in upholding justice.
Facts
- High Court decision deemed incorrect
- Appeal allowed by this Court
- Order of punishment by Administrative Committee found to be based on correct appreciation of facts and law
- No interference required in the decision
- Review Petitioner sought initiation of action against respondents under Section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
- Application was found to be devoid of merit and dismissed.
- Grounds raised in the Review Petition did not show any error apparent on record justifying interference in Review Jurisdiction.
Also Read: Electoral Malpractices in Mayor Election
Decision
- Review Petition dismissed due to delay of 62 days in preferring it
- Application for listing Review Petition in open Court rejected
Also Read: Balancing Power and Transparency: Electoral Bonds Struck Down, Disclosure Mandated
Case Title: JAGPAL SINGH Vs. CHAIRMAN ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE UP MILK UNION DIARY FEDERATION CENTRALIZED SERVICES (2021 INSC 894)
Case Number: R.P.(C) No.-001399 / 2021
