Delve into a detailed legal analysis of a case concerning a medical college’s violation of admission regulations. The court’s examination of the regulations governing medical education sheds light on the implications of non-compliance. Follow this summary to understand the legal intricacies involved in maintaining regulatory standards in educational institutions.
Facts
- The College admitted 132 students in violation of the Regulations
- The Medical Council of India directed the College to discharge these students
- The students who were aware of the violation are directed to do community service for two years after completing their MBBS course
- The admissions were made from students not allotted by the third Respondent
- Despite being aware of the violation, the College continued with the students’ studies
- Admissions of the 132 students were contrary to the Regulations
- Cancellation of the students’ admissions at this stage would not serve a purpose
- Students from the list of 150 were supposed to join before the last date
- College should have approached the Court for an extension of time if students did not join
- Students were permitted to take examinations for the first year MBBS course
- Result of the first year MBBS course was directed to be declared provisionally
- Students were not allowed to claim any equities on the declaration of the result
Also Read: Legal Analysis on Seniority Fixation in Contempt Petitions
Arguments
- The Medical Council of India relied on Regulation 5 A of the Medical Council Regulations on Graduate Medical Education, 1997, stating that admissions to the MBBS course must be based on the NEET merit list.
- The Regulations prohibit the Petitioner-College from making admissions on its own; admissions must be from the list sent by the Director General Medical Education based on NEET rankings.
- Students admitted contrary to the Regulations are not entitled to claim any equity, and the College may face penalties for blatant violation.
- Regulation 5 A also mandates counselling for MBBS course admissions in all medical educational institutions based on the NEET merit list.
Also Read: Interpretation of Section 80-IA Deductions
Analysis
- All admissions to medical colleges should be done through centralized counselling by State Governments.
- The College made a mistake by admitting 132 students without involving the third Respondent for sending more candidates.
- This direction is issued to save the students from losing three academic years.
- The circumstances of this case are considered peculiar.
- The direction is not to be treated as a precedent.
Also Read: Judicial Analysis on Selection Process
Decision
- Petitioners directed not to recover amounts from students
- Petitioner-College to deposit Rs. 5 crores in the Court registry within 8 weeks
- National Medical Commission to file Action Taken Report and Trust-Deed copy within 12 weeks
- Trust to be constituted by National Medical Commission to manage the deposited amount
- Trust to include Accountant General of UP, an educationist, and a UP representative as members
- Trust to provide financial aid to needy students seeking medical college admission in UP
Case Title: SARASWATI EDUCATIONAL CHARITABLE TRUST Vs. UNION OF INDIA (2021 INSC 114)
Case Number: W.P.(C) No.-000040 / 2018
