In a recent legal case, a review petition was filed challenging a previous court decision. However, the court thoroughly examined the grounds, finding no justification for interference. The decision to deny the review petition was upheld, emphasizing the importance of legal analysis in such matters. Learn more about the legal intricacies in this case.
Facts
- Review petition arises from the order dated 26.07.2021 in Special Leave Petition No.11323 of 2021.
- Original order was against the order dated 03.12.2019 of Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench.
- State Government granted liberty to fill remaining vacancies as per law after fresh advertisement.
- Review Petition (Civil) No. 32 of 2022 was rejected on 11.1.2022 with observations.
- A subsidiary issue regarding refund of prescribed fees was raised by the petitioners.
- The petition was dismissed on 26.07.2021 due to lack of merit in the substantive submissions.
- Fresh selection process was initiated following the dismissal of the petition.
- The petitioners contended that the selection process should have been taken to its logical conclusion.
Also Read: Electoral Malpractices in Mayor Election
Analysis
- Review petition grounds thoroughly examined
- No justification found for interference
- Decision to deny review petition upheld
Also Read: Balancing Power and Transparency: Electoral Bonds Struck Down, Disclosure Mandated
Decision
- The review petition has been dismissed.
- It was raised that 95 candidates did not meet the criteria of 60% for reserved category and 70% for unreserved category, as per interim orders.
- The controversy has been considered three times already.
- Permission as prayed for is not granted.
Also Read: Recall of Resolution Plan Approval: Legal Analysis
Case Title: VIJAY PRATAP YADAV Vs. THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH (2022 INSC 227)
Case Number: R.P.(C) No.-000278 / 2022
