Analysis of Criminal Conspiracy in Kidnapping Case

Delve into a detailed analysis of criminal conspiracy as examined by the court in a recent kidnapping case. Understanding the legal principles and criteria for proving such allegations is crucial in upholding justice and ensuring fair trials.

Facts

  • Upendra Kumar Singh’s appeal has abated due to his expiration.
  • Pradeep Kumar Shrivastava’s conviction was upheld and his appeal was dismissed on October 22, 2010.
  • Desh Deepak Kumar Vihangam, Bimlesh Kumar Singh, Madan Prasad Thathera, Kanhaiya Lal, Ramjee Prajapati, and Abhay Kumar were convicted under Sections 364A and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
  • The 6 convicts were sentenced to Life Imprisonment.
  • Desh Deepak Kumar Vihangam was fined Rs. 7,00,000, while the other convicts were fined Rs. 1,00,000 each.
  • The High Court acquitted Santosh, and the State did not appeal against this acquittal.
  • Inspector K.K. Singh (PW-4) and I.O. Yogesh Chandra (PW-8) received information about the location of Dr. Shashi Kumar Sinha (PW-3) and Salauddin (PW-5) who were kidnapped for ransom.
  • Deepak Kumar made a disclosure statement leading the police team to Village Bar in District Aurangabad, Bihar where the victims were rescued from the house of Upendra Kumar Sinha.
  • Dr. Shashi Kumar Sinha (PW-3) and Salauddin (PW-5) identified the kidnappers Bimlesh Kumar, Madan Prasad Thathera, Pradeep Kumar, and Upendra Kumar in court.
  • Rs. 6,00,000/- were recovered from Deepak Kumar’s premises in Patna based on his disclosure statement.
  • Dr. Amitabh Sinha (PW-1) was instrumental in tracking down the culprits and apprehending them, aiding in the rescue of the victims.
  • Dr. Amitabh Sinha (PW-1) paid a ransom of Rs. 12,00,000/- to Deepak Kumar at Ranchi on 24 February 2006, leading to the arrest of Deepak Kumar and Kanhaiya Lal in Patna on 10 March 2006.

Also Read: Analysis of Bail Conditions in Criminal Appeal No. INSC 48/2024

Analysis

  • The prosecution does not allege Kanhaiya Lal’s involvement in the kidnapping incident.
  • Dr. Amitabh Sinha (PW-1) did not witness Kanhaiya Lal and Deepak Kumar being apprehended near Patna Medical College.
  • Kanhaiya Lal stated he picked up Deepak Kumar as called to take him to Patna Medical College.
  • No evidence of Kanhaiya Lal’s involvement in the kidnapping conspiracy was found.
  • Ramjee Prajapati and Abhay Kumar were not connected to the kidnappers before the incident.
  • Inspector K.K. Singh and I.O. Yogesh Chandra expressed doubts about Kanhaiya Lal’s involvement in the crime.
  • No clear evidence implicating Kanhaiya Lal in the kidnapping scheme.
  • Benefit of doubt given to Kanhaiya Lal based on the doubts expressed by the investigators.
  • No prior knowledge or communication with the kidnappers was established for Kanhaiya Lal.
  • Involvement in a criminal conspiracy cannot be assumed based on mere suspicion without concrete evidence.
  • To prove criminal conspiracy, there must be evidence direct or circumstantial of an agreement between two or more persons to commit an offence.
  • The prosecution must show a meeting of minds resulting in a decision by the conspirators regarding the commission of an offence.
  • The prosecution has to prove the case against the accused beyond reasonable doubt.
  • The elements of criminal conspiracy include an object to be accomplished, a plan or scheme, an agreement between accused persons, and, in jurisdictions where required, an overt act.
  • Criminal conspiracy is complete when the unlawful combination is formed.
  • Direct independent evidence of criminal conspiracy is generally not available; its existence is inferred from means adopted and illegal acts done in furtherance of the conspiracy.
  • Circumstances relied upon for inferring a conspiracy should precede the actual commission of the offence.
  • The ingredients of criminal conspiracy involve an agreement to do an illegal act or to do an act, by illegal means, which may not be illegal on its own.
  • The family of Dr. Shashi Kumar Sinha received ransom calls even after the arrest of Ramjee Prajapati and Abhay Kumar.
  • Deepak Kumar’s arrest led to the location where Dr. Shashi Kumar Sinha was kept after the abduction.
  • Police did not link Ramjee Prajapati and Abhay Kumar to the ‘other’ kidnappers, leading to a benefit of doubt for them.

Also Read: Conviction Upheld for Murder and Concealment of Body

Decision

  • All pending applications disposed of
  • Bail bonds of Kanhaiya Lal, Ramjee Prajapati, and Abhay Kumar cancelled
  • Convictions under Section 364A and 120B of the Penal Code set aside for Kanhaiya Lal, Ramjee Prajapati, and Abhay Kumar
  • Deepak Kumar to surrender within 10 days to serve life imprisonment and pay fine of Rs. 7,00,000
  • Dismissal of appeals and affirmation of convictions for Desh Deepak Kumar Vihangam, Bimlesh Kumar Singh, and Madan Prasad Thathera
  • Police to detain and arrest Deepak Kumar if he does not surrender

Also Read: 1991 Decree Invalid: No Determination of Rights in Property Dispute

Case Title: DESH DEEPAK KUMAR VIHANGAM@ DEEPAK KUMAR Vs. THE STATE OF BIHAR (2022 INSC 278)

Case Number: Crl.A. No.-000673-000673 / 2011

Click here to read/download original judgement

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *