In a recent legal case, the court delves into the realm of bail conditions and provides a detailed legal analysis of the situation. The decision showcases the importance of compliance with set conditions and the consequences of any potential misuse of liberty. Let’s explore the significant aspects of the court’s judgment and its implications on legal proceedings.
Facts
- The appellant was taken into custody on 25.12.2020
- The crime was registered based on a complaint dated 24.02.2021
- The offences were punishable under Sections 132/134 of the Central Goods and Services Tax, 2017
- The case was registered in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Panipat
- Appellant’s application for bail under Section 439 of the CrPC was dismissed by the High Court.
- Appellant was directed to deposit Rs.4 Crores within four months.
- By order dated 13.05.2021, appellant was granted ad-interim bail on the condition of depositing Rs.1 Crore within four weeks and three subsequent deposits of Rs.1 Crore each within specified timelines.
- Certain additional directions were passed subsequently.
Also Read: Balancing Power and Transparency: Electoral Bonds Struck Down, Disclosure Mandated
Decision
- The appellant is directed not to misuse his liberty.
- Any misuse may result in the withdrawal of the benefit of bail.
- The appeal is allowed with the appellant having deposited Rs.4 Crores.
- The appellant will continue to be on bail under the same conditions as ad-interim bail.
- The security and surety documents provided earlier will remain in effect as bail conditions.
Also Read: Recall of Resolution Plan Approval: Legal Analysis
Case Title: MOHIT BATHLA Vs. CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX (2022 INSC 376)
Case Number: Crl.A. No.-000519-000519 / 2022
