Explore the intricacies of legal analysis in a recent case where the court confirmed juvenility. Delving into the depths of criminal law, this case sheds light on the importance of legal procedures in ensuring fair outcomes. Join us as we uncover the details of this significant legal analysis.
Facts
- Multiple injuries reported on various parts of the body of the individuals involved.
- Different types of injuries such as bruises, abrasions, lacerated wounds, and fractures were observed.
- The injuries were caused by blunt objects like ‘Lathi’ and sharp cutting weapons.
- Various individuals, including the accused and the victims, suffered injuries during the incident.
- The reporting of the incident led to the registration of a criminal case under different sections of the IPC.
- The medical reports indicated the severity of the injuries and their potential to cause death.
- The accused individuals had cross versions of the incident, leading to multiple FIRs being filed.
- Some of the accused were found to be juveniles at the time of the incident.
- The high court judgment on the case was challenged in the appeal.
- Convicted accused Hanuman, Mangoo Ram, Surja Ram, and Jagdish died during the pendency of the appeal, leading to abatement of proceedings for those accused.
- Eight persons were found guilty and sentenced to life imprisonment for offenses under various sections of the IPC.
- The convicted accused filed an appeal in the High Court which was dismissed, affirming the view of the Trial Court.
- A submission was made during the proceedings regarding the juvenility of appellants no.2 to 4, claiming benefit under the Juvenile Justice Act.
- The issue of juvenility was referred to the Sessions Court for consideration based on a previous ruling allowing juvenility claim at any stage.
- Report on juvenility of appellants no.2 to 4 is awaited from the Sessions Court in Rajasthan.
Also Read: Electoral Malpractices in Mayor Election
Analysis
- The incident started with an exchange of words between the ladies and escalated into physical violence with blows exchanged.
- Most injuries suffered by the prosecution witnesses were from blunt objects, not sharp cutting weapons.
- The deceased died from injuries inflicted by a blunt object like a lathi, leading to a conclusion of culpable homicide not amounting to murder.
- The place of occurrence was identified as an agricultural field at Khasra No.210.
- There was a dispute over the agricultural field between the parties involved.
- Some accused persons also sustained injuries, with some caused by sharp cutting weapons.
- Appropriate sentence for the principal offence under Section 304-II and 304-II read with 149 of the IPC is six years of imprisonment
- Accused should be released forthwith if they have completed six years of sentence, unless their custody is required for another offence
- Accused Sita Ram and Mangla Ram have completed about six years of sentence
- All accused would be primarily guilty of the offences under Section 304-II and Section 304-II read with Section 149 of the IPC
Also Read: Balancing Power and Transparency: Electoral Bonds Struck Down, Disclosure Mandated
Decision
- Juvenility of two accused, named Prahlad and Ganesh, confirmed by the Sessions Judge
- Directed to be dealt with in accordance with Section 20 of the J.J. Act, 2000 and Section 25 of the J.J. Act, 2015
Also Read: Recall of Resolution Plan Approval: Legal Analysis
Case Title: SITA RAM Vs. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN (2021 INSC 683)
Case Number: Crl.A. No.-000462-000462 / 2019
