In a recent landmark judgment, a court upheld the conviction and sentence of the accused under Sections 376, 302, and 309 of the IPC. The legal analysis provided by the court during the appeal process highlights the meticulous scrutiny of the evidence and the application of the law in this case. This case sets a significant precedent in understanding the complexities of criminal law and the judicial process.
Facts
- The conviction and sentence recorded by the Trial Court was affirmed by the High Court in appeal.
Also Read: Balancing Power and Transparency: Electoral Bonds Struck Down, Disclosure Mandated
Decision
- Special Leave Petition dismissed by the Court
- Review Petition filed
- No error apparent on record to justify interference found
- Accused found guilty under Sections 376, 302, and 309 of the IPC
Also Read: Recall of Resolution Plan Approval: Legal Analysis
Case Title: KORUKANTI KUMAR Vs. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH (2022 INSC 1148)
Case Number: R.P.(Crl.) No.-000308 / 2022
