Explore the intricacies of the judicial system as it delves into the legal aspects of e-commerce in a recent case. Discover how the court’s analysis has shaped the future landscape of online platforms. Stay tuned for insights on this significant legal milestone.
Facts
- The High Court made two tentative observations against the OLX Group.
- Notice was directed to be issued to the newly added respondents 5 to 8.
- An interim direction was given by the High Court.
- The High Court order was stayed by the Court on 10.01.2022 with respect to directions against the appellant.
- Respondents 6 and 7 were removed from the case, and the correct name of respondent 5 (OLX India B.V.) was clarified.
- Advertisements on OLX must be in PDF format and include specific information for acceptance.
- The original petitioner did not appear in court.
- All advertisements on OLX platform are to be deleted and re-listed with specific requirements.
Also Read: Electoral Malpractices in Mayor Election
Arguments
- Appellant provides an internet platform for vendors to advertise goods and merchandise.
- Appellant is not liable for the quality or genuineness of the products sold on the platform.
- High Court issued interim directions without hearing the appellant.
- High Court’s directions quashed by the Supreme Court.
- Supreme Court allows the appeal to the extent indicated.
Also Read: Balancing Power and Transparency: Electoral Bonds Struck Down, Disclosure Mandated
Case Title: OLX INDIA B.V. Vs. THE STATE OF HARYANA (2022 INSC 277)
Case Number: Crl.A. No.-000378-000378 / 2022
