In a recent legal case, the court made a significant decision to reduce the substantive sentence to six months and directed a substantial amount to be paid to the complainant as compensation. The court’s analysis focused on the lack of participation from the complainant and the absence of any apparent errors justifying a review of the ruling. Let’s delve into the details of how the court upheld its decision amidst the review petition.
Facts
- High Court reduced the substantive sentence to six months.
- The reduction was not challenged by either the prosecution or the complainant.
- The accused was directed to deposit Rs.2,50,000 for the complainant’s compensation.
- The complainant (Review Petitioner) chose not to enter appearance in the Court despite being served.
- It is important to note the lack of participation from the complainant in the proceedings.
Also Read: Electoral Malpractices in Mayor Election
Decision
- Substantive sentence was reduced
- Amount of Rs.2,50,000/- directed to be made over to the complainant
- Complainant seeking review of the order passed by this Court
- No error apparent to justify interference found in the grounds raised in the Review Petition
- Review Petition Application for listing Review Petition in open Court is rejected
Also Read: Balancing Power and Transparency: Electoral Bonds Struck Down, Disclosure Mandated
Case Title: POTTAYIL RADHA Vs. STATE OF KERALA (2021 INSC 849)
Case Number: R.P.(Crl.) No.-000407 / 2021
