In a recent development, the Delhi High Court has passed a judgement in the case of XYZ vs. ABC, where the petition regarding the framing of charges was dismissed. The court’s decision reflects the changing approach towards handling the case, as the investigation continues. To know more about this legal update, keep following our updates.
Facts
- Complainant argues that the documents already on record are sufficient for framing of charge.
- Investigation is ongoing, with the IO stating that replies to certain notices under Section 151 CPC 91 Cr.P.C. are pending.
Analysis
- The Trial Court had initially directed for filing and producing various documents collected by previous investigating officers.
- However, later on, the Trial Court acknowledged that the investigation was ongoing and the previous documents were untraceable.
- The Trial Court stated that pressing for the production of untraceable documents was not appropriate.
- The chargesheet in the case was filed in 2016, yet the charge has not been framed till date.
- In consideration of the complainant’s submissions and the prolonged process, the court has decided to proceed with the consideration on the point of charge.
- The next hearing for the consideration on the point of charge is scheduled for 30.03.2024 at 02:00 PM before MM-01 (West) in Delhi.
- The Trial Court’s earlier orders for producing investigation documents by previous investigating officers were modified by subsequent orders.
- The modification indicates a change in the approach towards handling the case.
Decision
- The present petition is dismissed.
- No merit is found in the present petition.
Case Title: BABU LAL Vs. VICHITRA VIRYA AND ORS (2024:DHC:3931)
Case Number: CONT.CAS(C)-781/2024
