A recent judgement by the Delhi High Court has shed light on the case involving the Plaintiffs and Defendant Mrs. Mala Mathur. The Court’s orders regarding asset distribution and property status quo are crucial steps towards resolving the dispute. This landmark decision is a significant development in the legal proceedings between the parties. Stay updated on the latest developments in this case.
Facts
- The Plaintiffs received 3 cheques totaling INR 450,688.50 from LIC, which decreased from the expected amount for reasons known only to Defendant Mrs. Mala Mathur.
- The release of the amount was only achieved after repeated follow-ups and insistence by the Plaintiffs.
- A sum of INR 1,22,926.68 remaining after the distribution was divided into 4 equal amounts by Plaintiff No.1.
- The Savings Bank account held jointly with Plaintiff No.1 has now been closed.
- The Plaintiff No.1 had to insist on the release of the total amount received, which was finally done by Mrs. Mala Mathur.
Arguments
- Mr. Ankit Jain, counsel for the Plaintiffs, states that his clients will not pursue any allegations against the Defendants if the Defendants also refrain from making allegations against the Plaintiffs.
Decision
- All other applications are disposed of as not pressed.
- List for receiving the report of the Local Commissioner on 28th August, 2024.
- The daughters and Defendant No.1 shall collectively pay a lump sum fee of Rs.2,00,000/- to the Local Commissioner.
- The Local Commissioner is to file a report by 1st August, 2024.
- Status quo concerning the property is to be maintained until final orders of the Court.
- I.A. 18591/2022 is disposed of.
- The Local Commissioner is authorized to liquidate and divide moveable assets equally.
- Plaintiff does not press for damages and rendition of accounts as per specific prayers g, k, and l.
- The Local Commissioner to take necessary steps regarding the possessions of the mother in the bank locker.
- The Local Commissioner to visit the property and notify the concerned parties.
- The Local Commissioner to contact State Bank of India regarding PPF accounts distribution.
Case Title: SEEMA DAYAL & ORS. Vs. MALA MATHUR & ANR. (2024:DHC:4291)
Case Number: CS(OS)-700/2022
