Legal Analysis in State vs. Union Territory Jurisdiction Case

Explore a fascinating legal case that delves into the complexities of jurisdiction disputes between States, Union Territories, CBI, and High Courts. The court’s meticulous analysis and directives provide crucial insights into the legal framework governing such disputes. Stay tuned to unravel the intricacies of court decisions shaping the interplay between different legal entities.

Arguments

  • The Amicus argues that certain directions in the Satender Kumar Antil case fall within the jurisdiction of States/Union Territories/CBI and High Courts.
  • The Amicus has thoroughly studied and verified the details before making this argument.
  • There are directions that fall under the domain of both the States and the High Courts.

Also Read: Compliance with Article 22(5) of the Constitution: Duty to Serve Grounds of Detention

Analysis

  • Union Territories directed to provide details of Special Courts constituted
  • States directed to provide details of steps taken for creation of Additional Special Courts
  • States directed to give details of non-compliance with Sections 41 and 41-A of CrPC and actions taken against erring police officers
  • States directed to ensure prosecutors are updated on legal positions and provide training periodically

Also Read: Dismissal of Application Seeking Bail Relief

Decision

  • Secretary, DLSA may engage with legal aid advocate to have the surety amount reduced
  • Appropriate orders may be passed by the trial Court for the return of the surety amount to the Government’s account
  • Discretion to pay bail amount higher than Rs. 40,000/- and recommend to the Empowered Committee
  • Benefit not available to persons accused under specified Acts
  • Procedure for release of convicted prisoners on account of non-payment of fine amount
  • Financial support for poor prisoners scheme up to Rs. 40,000/- per case
  • Monitoring of compliance by States, Union Territories, High Courts, Union of India, CBI, and NALSA

Also Read: Legal Interpretation and Resolution Plan Eligibility

Case Title: SATENDER KUMAR ANTIL Vs. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (2024 INSC 134)

Case Number: MA-002034 / 2022

Click here to read/download original judgement

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *