Violation of Jurisdiction and Illegal Construction in Upgradation of Infrastructure

The Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, Longewala, District Hanumangarh, Rajasthan/ Respondent No 4 in Writ Petition

Also Read: https://newslaw.in/supreme-court/appellants-obligation-under-mineral-auction-rules/

No 6557 of 2020 on the file of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan is 2 the Appellant.

The expression ‘upgradation of infrastructure’ in the preceding narrative is repetitive and necessary in as much as the Appellant as available from the record deviated from the resolution, sanction/ work order and constructed a new building for the Gram Panchayat in the playground of a school run by the Education Department in the Village. Without a challenge to the findings in the Judgment under Appeal, he suggests that the Court may take note of subsequent developments remedy substantially the grievance canvassed in the Writ Petition and pass orders as are deemed necessary.

The Counsel appearing for the First Respondent does not dispute that the playground is earmarked and made available for the school children of. In wake of the above facts, we feel that inquiry deserves to be made regarding the conduct of respondent No.2 Vikas Adhikari and respondent No.4 Sarpanch, who abused their 7 powers and acted beyond jurisdiction while raising the construction of the new Panchayat Bhawan totally against the approved plan proposal and the sanction. The above excerpts from the Impugned Judgment indicate that the Appellant and Vikas Adhikari/ Respondent

Also Read: https://newslaw.in/?p=680

No 5, have not discharged the official function or duty in the manner expected of them or conforming to the local laws.

Before considering the extent to which we can modify the directions, we notice that constructing a building in a playground, particularly on a plot of land standing in the name of the Education Department and without administrative sanction, is of grave concern and illegal. (iii) The Competent Authority shall conclude the enquiry directed against the Appellant and Vikas Adhikari Respondent

No 2 within four months from today.

Also Read: https://newslaw.in/supreme-court/courts-legal-analysis-on-quashing-of-fir-for-fraud-and-embezzlement/

621 OF 2023

Case Title: THE SARPANCH Vs. MANVEER SINGH

Case Number: C.A. No.-005281-005281 / 2023

Click here to read/download original judgement

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *